cryptidcurrency

  As a child in Chino, California, Kevin Wikse repeatedly witnessed a mysterious television commercial depicting a scientist haunted by millions of microscopic ghosts—a movie he has never been able to identify. Witness: Kevin Wikse Location: Chino, California Approximate Date: Early childhood, approximately age 5–6 Estimated Era: Early-to-mid 1980s Primary Location of Encounter: Family residence, laundry room Time of Broadcast: Daytime/early evening commercial advertising a late-night movie scheduled for approximately 11:00 p.m. or midnight Duration of Phenomenon: Recurring over approximately one summer and into a school year Phenomenon Classification: Anomalous television broadcast / possible interdimensional bleed-through Associated Phenomena: Multiple childhood experiences of high strangeness in the same geographical area Report Type: Retrospective first-person account Reported by: Kevin Wikse Background Continuing with a few more personal accounts from my own unplann...

At 3:03 A.M., Kevin Wikse shares a moment with the Loveland Frogman along the Little Miami River. The wand, reported in the original 1955 encounter, activates. After a few beers, the Loveland Frogman reveals just how much your mom loves his sparky rod. Most cryptids earn their place in American folklore through violence. Bigfoot is accused of throwing rocks. Dogman allegedly stalks lonely roads. The Jersey Devil has frightened generations of Pine Barrens travelers. The Loveland Frogman is different. It doesn't chase anyone. It doesn't attack. It doesn't leave bodies behind. Instead, it appears briefly, almost quietly—maybe too quietly—before disappearing back into the darkness surrounding the Little Miami River. That alone makes the case unusual. Then there's the wand. One witness described a frog-like humanoid raising a metallic rod that emitted visible sparks into the night sky. Seventeen years later, two police officers would report encounters with a remarkably...

  6/8/23 Amazing the life of its own, this simple piece I wrote took on. I've become an authority concerning the Dog Woman of Watts in many ways, most of them small. Seeing and reading the reactions this piece has caused has also been an experience. For the most part, I am happy to have become a key contributor to the discussion. My name and work are cited, and I am credited for my writing. I am sure Clifton would get a kick out of knowing that.  I cleaned up and revised my original piece in 2016 or 2017. I will include a link to the original post at the end. I find it fascinating that my speculations and postulations, especially concerning MK-Ultra and Animal/Human hybrid genetic experimentation, have emerged as fact. It serves as validation and inspiration to continue researching and writing. To all those who have attempted to misrepresent my work, thank you. You have been the best advertising I could hope for. All this dirt you tried throwing on my name made me a hill to st...