Bitterroot Wildman: The Bauman Incident and America’s First Cryptid Homicide | Kevin Wikse

 

The Ape-Like Killer of the Bitterroots

Bauman’s “Goblin” and the Modern Shadow of Peter Hall

The Bitterroot Ape-Man as described in Theodore Roosevelt’s Bauman Incident, analyzed and reconstructed by Kevin Wikse.

Case File Summary:

The Bitterroot Ape-Man, also referred to as the Bitterroot Wildman, is a legendary upright, ape-like predator associated with the Bitterroot Range of Idaho and Montana. The entity entered the historical record through Theodore Roosevelt’s 1893 account of the Bauman Incident, describing a large, powerful, foul-smelling, bipedal creature implicated in the violent death of a trapper. Modern folklore has linked similar descriptions to later disappearances in the region. Research and analysis by Kevin Wikse positions the Bitterroot Ape-Man as one of North America’s earliest documented “wildman” homicide cases, predating modern Sasquatch terminology.

_________________________________________________________________________________

There are mountain ranges that feel indifferent.

And there are ranges that feel like they’re watching you.

The Bitterroot Range—hard spine of rock and timber straddling Idaho and Montana—has carried a particular kind of wilderness story for more than a century: the idea that something upright, huge, and wrong moves through those valleys. Not a bear. Not a man. Something else.

Depending on who’s telling it, this thing is a “wildman,” a “goblin,” a Bigfoot, a shadow-being, or the kind of predator that doesn’t just hunt—it decides.

This post puts the two biggest pillars of that Bitterroot legend side-by-side:

1. The Bauman Incident, recorded by Theodore Roosevelt in 1893. Project Gutenberg Australia+1

2. The modern folklore orbiting the 2008 disappearance of an Idaho hunter, often named Peter Hall, with remains said to be found years later. YouTube+2YouTube+2

And we’ll deal honestly with the claim that the Nez Perce call it “Shadow Man of the Mountains” or “Kai Kai Tah”: I looked for that attribution in accessible Nez Perce language/archival sources and could not verify it. (More on that below.) Nez Perce Tribe+2Smithsonian Libraries+2

---

The Bauman Incident

America’s most famous “something killed my partner” wilderness account

Theodore Roosevelt calls it a “goblin story.” That’s his framing, not mine. It appears in The Wilderness Hunter (1893), told to Roosevelt by an old mountain man named Bauman. Project Gutenberg Australia+1

The setting: the right country, the right kind of lonely

Roosevelt places the incident in the mountains dividing the forks of the Salmon River from the head of the Wisdom River—the Wisdom being an older name associated with what’s now the Big Hole River drainage. In plain language: Bitterroot/Beaverhead borderlands, deep backcountry. Cryptomundo+1

The timeline of fear (as Roosevelt records it)

Two trappers. A remote valley. They build a lean-to. And then:

• Night disturbances: heavy footsteps circling camp, a sense of being sized up. Project Gutenberg Australia

• Destruction: their lean-to gets torn down while they’re out. Not “wind damage.” Not “a raccoon got curious.” Something with force and attitude. Project Gutenberg Australia

• The tracks: Roosevelt’s account emphasizes large footprints and the idea the thing moved on two legs. That’s one of the details that made later Bigfoot researchers grab this story by the throat and refuse to let go. Bigfoot Encounters+1

• The smell: a “rank” wild-animal stench saturating the camp area. Bigfoot Encounters+1

• The sound: a long, uncanny moan/cry. Not a wolf. Not an owl. Something that doesn’t belong in the normal catalog. Project Gutenberg Australia

Then the real knife-turn:

Bauman returns to camp and finds his partner dead. The partner’s neck broken, the throat bitten—and the tracks again suggesting the thing approached and departed in a way Bauman interpreted as bipedal. Bauman flees through the night and never again wants to trap alone. Project Gutenberg Australia+1

Roosevelt’s conclusion: belief, not certainty

Roosevelt does not say “Bigfoot killed the man.” Bigfoot wasn’t even a modern term yet. He does something more valuable: he reports Bauman’s absolute conviction while admitting uncertainty about what it was. Project Gutenberg Australia+1

That’s the Bauman Incident in its pure form:
A story old enough to have teeth, and still ambiguous enough to haunt.

---

What did the creature look like in Bauman’s account?

Descriptions you can actually extract from the text

Roosevelt does not provide a clean monster portrait (“it had a sloped brow, sagittal crest, and a bad attitude”). What we get are behavioral and sensory descriptions that imply a physical profile:

• Very large / powerful (able to wreck the shelter and kill a man). Project Gutenberg Australia

• Moved “on two legs” (at least some of the time, as interpreted from tracks). Bigfoot Encounters+1

• Rank stench, close enough to saturate camp. Project Gutenberg Australia

• Unsettling vocalization (long moan/cry). Project Gutenberg Australia

• Intelligent predation: it doesn’t rush the fire; it works the edges, tests them, hits when they split. Project Gutenberg Australia

If you want a working description that stays honest to the text, it’s this:

A large, strong, upright-moving wilderness predator with an overpowering smell and a long, unnatural cry—operating with patience and timing rather than animal panic.

That’s enough to build a likeness. It’s also enough to turn your stomach when the forest goes quiet.

---

The Peter Hall Connection

What’s claimed vs. what’s documented

Now we step from 1893 print to modern digital folklore.

Online retellings commonly claim:

• An experienced hunter named Peter Hall vanished in the Bitterroot area in October 2008. YouTube+1

• Remains were later found years afterward (often cited as 2016). YouTube+1

• Some versions add “strange fur,” a pursued/hunted narrative, or a humanoid predator explanation—mostly in social media and long-form narration videos. Facebook+1

Here’s the key: the ape-creature explanation is not something I can validate from official sources in the material surfaced here. What I’m seeing is a story ecosystem—videos, Facebook posts, cryptid communities—where the Bitterroots already have a legendary template (Bauman), and modern tragedies get folded into that template. Facebook+1

That doesn’t mean nothing strange happened.
It means we respect the line between case facts and campfire interpretation—because if your brand is “authoritative,” you don’t pretend rumor is evidence.

So the honest framing is:

The Hall case is a modern disappearance/death associated in folklore with an “ape-like killer,” but the creature attribution circulates primarily in online retellings rather than primary documentation. YouTube+1

---

“Shadow Man of the Mountains” and “Kai Kai Tah”

The Nez Perce claim—and why it’s currently unconfirmed

You’ll see people online attach Indigenous labels to give a creature story ancestral weight. Sometimes that’s true. Sometimes it’s costume jewelry on a rumor.

I looked for “Kai Kai Tah” and for a Nez Perce “shadow man of the mountains” being, and I cannot verify that name or phrase in accessible Nez Perce language/archival resources.

What I can point to is that:

• There are publicly available Nez Perce language and reference materials (language program pages, dictionaries, instructional PDFs) that can be used to verify terms when we have correct spelling and context. Nez Perce Tribe+2Smithsonian Libraries+2

• A “shadow-man” phrase does appear in a digitized text (Yellow Wolf: His Own Story), but in that context it appears to refer to human enemies/ambushers, not a supernatural forest entity—so it’s not evidence of a cryptid name. Internet Archive

So here’s the clean, responsible stance:

The “Nez Perce call it Shadow Man / Kai Kai Tah” attribution is unverified in the accessible record. It may be a misunderstanding, a misspelling, a modern invention, or a term from another group being misassigned.

If you can produce any one of the following, we can nail it down fast:

• an alternate spelling (“k—k—tah” can be a dozen things),

• a book title,

• a quote screenshot,

• or the elder/storyteller/source chain.

Then we’d have something worth hanging our name on.

---

Sidebar: Why “Shadow Man” keeps showing up in the wrong places

The Choctaw aren’t from Idaho — but their motif travels

You asked where the Choctaw are from: historically, they are a Southeastern nation (centered in Mississippi and surrounding regions), with removal tied to the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek (1830). Treaties+2Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma+2

Why does this matter? Because some “shadow being” descriptions online match Southeastern motifs—especially the “tall, thin, very dark” profile—then get transplanted into the Northwest as if it’s the same creature.

In the modern internet, folklore migrates faster than people ever did.

---

So what is the Bitterroot thing, really?

There are three clean hypotheses, and I’m opinionated about how they stack:

1. A bear explanation (skeptical angle)
   Grizzlies can kill. They can bite. They can break necks. Under fear, tracks get misread—especially in soft ground and poor light.

2. A human explanation (dark angle)
   Frontier country had violent men, and “something got him” is the oldest way to launder a murder into myth.

3. An unknown hominid / wildman tradition (cryptid angle)
   The Bauman story’s combination—bipedal implication, smell, vocalization, stalking intelligence—matches later Sasquatch report clusters so closely that it’s hard not to raise an eyebrow.

My take:
Bauman is a cornerstone because it doesn’t read like a drunk tall tale. It reads like fear.
And fear, when it’s real, has a certain boring clarity to it.

-Kevin Wikse

Founder, Cryptidcurrency · Cryptid Researcher & Investigator of High Strangeness
Taking stock in what stalks you.

Kevin Wikse is an investigative writer and researcher specializing in historical cryptids, wilderness anomalies, and pre-modern Sasquatch cases. His work focuses on separating documented encounters from modern folklore while preserving the original power of the record.